Assessment for knowledge increase of industrial enterprises / Vlasov M., Panikarova S., Boyko I.P. // Proceedings of the European Conference on Knowledge Management, ECKM. - 2016. - V. 2016-January, l. . - P. 945-951.

ISSN:
20488963
Type:
Conference Paper
Abstract:
The research develops theory and practice of strategic planning in the field of knowledge generation as competitiveness factors of economic entities. This work was aimed at assessment for knowledge increase of industrial enterprises depending on cost structure for research and development. During the study the following hypotheses were tested: 1) Sort of knowledge-generation strategy is also defined by the variety of changed resource and generated knowledge; 2) There is a correlation between the structure of costs for different types of knowledge and the quantity of new products made by the company; 3) There is a correlation between the structure of expenditures on different types of knowledge and profit growth due to new knowledge. The article takes an eclectic methodological approach piecing together extant literature and to discover new empirical knowledge about knowledge generation. To analyze the characteristics of knowledge increase of industrial enterprises were used results of the questionnaire from 102 enterprises, from six industries. Authors believe that efficient innovational development of the industrial companies, particularly in a challenging economic situation, first of all, requires optimal (that is oriented towards firm needs) cost structure for different types of knowledge.
Author keywords:
Innovation; Knowledge management; Resources; Strategy
Index keywords:
Costs; Industrial research; Innovation; Knowledge management; Research and development management; Industrial companies; Industrial enterprise; Innovational development; Knowledge generations; Methodo
DOI:
нет данных
Смотреть в Scopus:
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84996629845&partnerID=40&md5=716bf66edc6a62804c6cb0ca5642068a
Соавторы в МНС:
Другие поля
Поле Значение
Link https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84996629845&partnerID=40&md5=716bf66edc6a62804c6cb0ca5642068a
Affiliations Ural Federal University, Russian Federation; Saint Petersburg University, Russian Federation
Author Keywords Innovation; Knowledge management; Resources; Strategy
References Arrow, K., Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention (1962) The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, pp. 619-625. , Princeton University Press; Dahlander, L., Gann, D.M., How open is innovation? (2010) Research Policy, 39, pp. 699-709; Dasgupta, P., Maskin, E., The Simple Economics of Research Portfolios (1987) The Economic Journal, 97 (387), pp. 581-595; Delbono, V., Denicolo, V., Incentives to Innovate in a Cournot Oligopoly (1991) The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106 (3), pp. 951-961; Denicolo, V., Two-Stage Patent Races and Patent Policy (2000) Rand Journal of Economics, 31, pp. 488-501; Ferrary, M., Specialized organizations and ambidextrous clusters in the open innovation paradigm (2011) European Management Journal, 29, pp. 181-192; Festel, G., Reasons for corporate research and development spin-outs-the chemical and pharmaceutical industry as example (2014) R&D Management, 44, pp. 398-408; Gokhberg, L., Roud, V., The Russian Federation: A New Innovation Policy for Sustainable Growth (2012) The Global Innovation Index 2012: Stronger Innovation Linkages for Global Growth, pp. 121-130. , Paris; Bristol: INSEAD, WIPO; García-Manjón, J.V., Romero-Merino, M.E., Research, development, and firm growth Empirical evidence from European top R&D spending firms (2012) Research Policy, 41, pp. 1084-1092; Grant, R.M., Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration (1996) Organization Science, 7 (4), pp. 375-387; Hunt, R., Patentability, Industry Structure, and Innovation (2004) Journal of Industrial Economics, 52 (3), pp. 401-425; Harison, E., Koski, H., 'Applying open innovation in business strategies: Evidence from Finnish software firms' (2009) Research Policy, 39, pp. 351-359; Lee, T., Wilde, L.L., Market Structure and Innovation: A Reformulation (1980) The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 94 (2), pp. 429-436; Loury, G.C., Market Structure and Innovation (1979) The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 93 (3), pp. 395-410; March, J.G., Exploration and exploitation in organizational leaning (1991) Organization Science, 2 (1), pp. 71-87; O'Donoghue, T., Scotchmer, S., Thisse, J., Patent Breadth, Patent Life, and the Pace of Technological Improvement (1998) Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 7, pp. 1-32; Reinganum, J.F., Uncertain Innovation and the Persistence of Monopoly (1983) The American Economic Review, 73 (4), pp. 741-748; Sah, R., Stiglitz, J., The Invariance of Market Innovation to the Number of Firms (1987) The RAND Journal of Economics, 18 (1), pp. 98-108; Saito, A., Umemoto, K., Ikeda, M., A strategy-based ontology of knowledge management technologies (2007) Journal of Knowledge Management, 11 (1), pp. 97-114; Scotchmer, S., Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Cumulative Research and the Patent Law (1991) The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5 (1), pp. 29-41; Sveiby, K.E., A knowledge-based theory of the firm to guide in strategy formulation (2001) Journal of intellectual capital, 2 (4), pp. 344-358; Teece, D., 'Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation' (2010) Long Range Planning, 43 (1), pp. 172-194; Vlasov, M., Panikarova, S., Knowledge creation in state-owned enterprises (2015) Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6 (4), pp. 475-480
Editors Galbraith B.Moffett S.Galbraith B.
Publisher Academic Conferences Limited
ISBN 9781911218029
Language of Original Document English
Abbreviated Source Title Proc. Eur. Conf. Knowl. Manage., ECKM
Source Scopus