Entrepreneurial innovation and stakeholder relationship management / Belyaeva Z. // Entrepreneurial Challenges in the 21St Century: Creating Stakeholder Value Co-Creation. - 2016. - V. , l. . - P. 120-132.

ISSN:
нет данных
Type:
Book Chapter
Abstract:
[No abstract available]
Author keywords:
Index keywords:
нет данных
DOI:
10.1007/978-1-137-47976-1
Смотреть в Scopus:
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84960302805&doi=10.1007%2f978-1-137-47976-1&partnerID=40&md5=aae8fcbfa685849f9072ed9dad9479cc
Соавторы в МНС:
Другие поля
Поле Значение
Link https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84960302805&doi=10.1007%2f978-1-137-47976-1&partnerID=40&md5=aae8fcbfa685849f9072ed9dad9479cc
Affiliations Global Social Responsibility Excellence Centre, Ural Federal University, Russian Federation
References Adewale, A.R., Esther, M.M., The relationship between stakeholders involvement in strategic planning and organisation’s performance: A study of the university of venda (2012) International Business & Economics Research Journal, 11. , http://www.cluteinstitute.com/1177, [accessed 2 November 2014]; Asongu, J.J., Innovation as an argument for corporate social responsibility (2007) Journal of Business and Public Policy, 1 (3), pp. 1-21; Autio, E., Kenney, M., Mustar, P.H., Siegel, D., Wright, M., Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context (2014) Research Policy, 43, pp. 1097-1108; Balogun, J., Johnson, G., Organisational restructuring and middle manager sense making (2004) ACA Management Journal, 47 (4), pp. 523-549; Belyaeva, Z.S., (2010) Modeli sotsial’no Otvetstvennogo Biznesa V Mirovoi Ekonomike, , [Models of Socially Responsible Business in World Economy], Yekaterinburg: IE RAN; Belyaeva, Z.S., Transformation processes of the corporate development in russia: Social responsibility issues (2013) System Practice and Action Research, 26 (6), pp. 485-496; Bogers, M., The open innovation paradox: Knowledge sharing and protection in r and d collaborations (2011) European Journal of Innovation Management, 14 (1), pp. 93-117; Brummer, J.J., (1991) Corporate Responsibility and Legitimacy: An Interdisciplinary Analysis (Contributions in Philosophy), p. 344. , New York: Praeger; Carroll, A.B., The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders (1991) Business Horizons, 7 (8); Carroll, A.B., Corporate social responsibility - evolution of a definitional construct (1999) Business and Society, 38 (3), pp. 268-295; Crane, A., Matten, D., (2007) Business Ethics: Managing Corporate Citizenship and Sustainability in the Age of Globalization, , 2nd edn, New York: Oxford University Press; Crane, A., Palazzo, G., Spence, L.J., Matten, D., Contesting the value of the shared value concept (2014) California Management Review, 56-2. , http://ssrn.com/abstract=2368387], [accessed 2 April 2015, SSRN; Dess, G.G., Lumpkin, G.T., Eisner, A.B., McNamara, G., Kim, B., (2012) Strategic Management: Creating Competitive Advantages, , 6th edition. Irwin: McGraw-Hill; Donaldson, T., Preston, L.E., The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications (1995) Academy of Management Review, 20 (1), pp. 65-91; Freeman, E., McVea, J., Stakeholder theory: The state of the art (2001) Handbook of Strategic Management, , M. Hitt, E. Freeman, and J. Harrison, Oxford: Blackwell; Gould, R.W., Open innovation and stakeholder engagement (2012) Journal of Technology Management and Innovations, 7 (3), pp. 1-11; Granovetter, M., Economic action and social structure: A theory of embed-dedness (1985) American Journal of Sociology, 91, pp. 481-510; Halal, W.E., Business and government: A new partnership? (1987) Long Range Planning, 20 (1), pp. 123-130; Jarvenpaa, S.L., Wernick, A., Paradoxical tensions in open innovation networks (2011) European Journal of Innovation Management, 14 (4), pp. 521-548; Kaler, J., Differentiating stakeholder theories (2003) Journal of Business Ethics, 46, pp. 71-83; Kercher, K., (2007) Corporate Social Responsibility: Impact of Globalisation and International Business, , http://epublications.bond.edu.au/cgej/4, [accessed 20 January 2015]; Lindgreen, A., Swaen, V., Corporate social responsibility (2010) International Journal of Management Reviews, 12, pp. 1-7; Mark-Herbert, C., Rorarius, J., Tools for corporate assessment of sustainable development (2009) Organizational Communication and Sustainable Development. Icts for Mobility, pp. 100-115. , Hallin, A., Karrbom Gustafsson, T, Hershey, NY: Information Science Reference; Matten, D., Corporate citizenship: Towards an extended theoretical conceptualization (2005) Academy of Management Review, 1, pp. 168-170; Mitchell, R., Agle, B., Wood, D., Toward a theory of stakeholder iden-tification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts (1997) Academy of Management Review, 22 (4), pp. 853-886; Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R., Chrisman, J.J., Spence, L.J., Toward a theory of stakeholder salience in family firms (2011) Business Ethics Quarterly, 21 (2), pp. 235-255; Murray, K.B., Vogel, C.M., Using a hierarchy-of-effects approach to gauge the effectiveness of corporate social responsibility to generate goodwill toward firm: Financial versus nonfinancial impacts (1997) Journal of Business Research, 38, pp. 141-159; O’Riordan, L., Fairbrass, J., Managing csr stakeholder engagement: A new conceptual framework (2014) Journal of Business Ethics, 125, pp. 121-145; O’Sullivan, D., Dooley, L., (2009) Applying Innovation, , Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; Pfeffer, J., (1997) New Directions for Organizational Theory, , Y.: Oxford University Press; Porter, M.E., Kramer, M.R., Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility (2006) Harvard Business Review, 84 (12), pp. 78-92; Porter, M.E., Kramer, M.R., Creating shared value (2011) Harvard Business Review, 89 (1-2), pp. 62-77; Porter, M.E., Linde, C., Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship (1995) Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9 (4), pp. 97-118; Potocan, V., Mulej, M., (2007) From an Institutional Transition to a Real One into an Innovative Enterprise, , Maribor: FEB; Preble, J., Toward a comprehensive model of stakeholder management (2005) Business and Management Review, 22 (4), pp. 853-886; Reynolds, S.J., Schultz, F.C., Hekman, D.R., Stakeholder theory and managerial decision-making: Constraints and implications of balancing stakeholder interests (2006) Journal of Business Ethics, 64, pp. 285-301; Reynolds, S.J., Schultz, F.C., Hekman, D.R., Stakeholder theory and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts (2006) Academy of Society Review, 110 (4), pp. 407-431; (2009) Stakeholder Engagement and the Board: Integrating Best Governance Practices, , http://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/Topics_Ext_Content/IFC_External_Corporate_Site/Corporate+Governance/Publications/Focus_Case+Studies/, Global Corporate Governance Forum Focus 8, [accessed 20 March 2015]; Svendsen, A.C., Laberge, M., A new direction for csr: Engaging networks for whole systems change (2006) The Challenge of Organizing and Implementing Corporate Social Responsibility, pp. 248-261. , Jonker J., De Witte M. (eds). Palgrave Macmillan: Hampshire, New York; Visser, W., Csr 2.0 and the new dna of business (2010) Journal of Business Systems, Governance and Ethics, 5 (3); Vos, J., Achterkamp, M.C., Stakeholder identification in innovation projects - going beyond classification (2006) European Journal of Innovation Management, 9 (2), pp. 161-178
Correspondence Address Belyaeva, Z.; Global Social Responsibility Excellence Centre, Ural Federal UniversityRussian Federation
Publisher Palgrave Macmillan
ISBN 9781137479761; 9781137479747
Language of Original Document English
Abbreviated Source Title Entrepreneurial Challenges in the 21st Century: Creating Stakehold. Value Co-Creation
Source Scopus