| References |
Arrow, K., Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention (1962) The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, pp. 619-625. , Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; Bessen, J., Maskin, E., Sequential innovation, patents, and innovation (2006) NajEcon Working Paper Reviews, , http://www.najecon.org, Accessed on 10 March 2015; Bierly, P., Chakrabarti, A., Generic knowledge strategies in the U.S. Pharmaceutical industry (1996) Strategic Management Journal, 17, pp. 123-135. , Winter Special Issue; Dahlander, L., Gann, D.M., How open is innovation? (2010) Research Policy, 39, pp. 699-709; Dasgupta, P., Maskin, E., The simple economics of research portfolios (1987) The Economic Journal, 97 (387), pp. 581-595; Delbono, V., Denicolo, V., Incentives to innovate in a cournot oligopoly (1991) The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106 (3), pp. 951-961; Denicolo, V., Two-stage patent races and patent policy (2000) Rand Journal of Economics, 31, pp. 488-501; Ferrary, M., Specialized organizations and ambidextrous clusters in the open innovation paradigm (2011) European Management Journal, 29, pp. 181-192; Festel, G., Reasons for corporate research and development spin-outs - The chemical and pharmaceutical industry as example (2014) R&D Management, 44, pp. 398-408; García-Manjón, J.V., Romero-Merino, M.E., Research, development, and firm growth. Empirical evidence from european top R&D spending firms (2012) Research Policy, 41, pp. 1084-1092; Gokhberg, L., Roud, V., The Russian federation: A new innovation policy for sustainable growth (2012) The Global Innovation Index 2012: Stronger Innovation Linkages for Global Growth, pp. 121-130. , France: INSEAD & WIPO; Grant, R.M., Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration (1996) Organization Science, 7 (4), pp. 375-387; Hamel, G., Prahaland, C.K., (1994) Competing for the Future, , Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press; Hunt, R., Patentability, industry structure, and innovation (2004) Journal of Industrial Economics, 52 (3), pp. 401-425; Harison, E., Koski, H., Applying open innovation in business strategies: Evidence from finnish software firms (2009) Research Policy, 39, pp. 351-359; Lee, T., Wilde, L.L., Market structure and innovation: A reformulation (1980) The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 94 (2), pp. 429-436; Loury, G.C., Market structure and innovation (1979) The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 93 (3), pp. 395-410; March, J.G., Exploration and exploitation in organizational leaning (1991) Organization Science, 2 (1), pp. 71-87; Nordhaus, W., (1969) Invention, Growth and Welfare: A Theoretical Treatment of Technological Change, , Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press; O'Donoghue, T., Scotchmer, S., Thisse, J., Patent breadth, patent life, and the pace of technological improvement (1998) Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 7, pp. 1-32; Reinganum, J.F., Uncertain innovation and the persistence of monopoly (1983) The American Economic Review, 73 (4), pp. 741-748; Sah, R., Stiglitz, J., The invariance of market innovation to the number of firms (1987) The RAND Journal of Economics, 18 (1), pp. 98-108; Saito, A., Umemoto, K., Ikeda, M., A strategy-based ontology of knowledge management technologies (2007) Journal of Knowledge Management, 11 (1), pp. 97-114; Schumpeter, J., (1947) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, , 2nd edn. London: Allen and Unwin; Scotchmer, S., Standing on the shoulders of giants: Cumulative research and the patent law (1991) The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5 (1), pp. 29-41; Sveiby, K.E., A knowledge-based theory of the firm to guide in strategy formulation (2001) Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2 (4), pp. 344-358; Teece, D., Business models, business strategy and innovation (2010) Long Range Planning, 43 (1), pp. 172-194; Valenta, F., (1985) Management of Innovation, , Moscow: Progress; Vlasov, M., Panikarova, S., Knowledge creation in state-owned enterprises (2015) Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6 (4), pp. 475-480 |